Many people believe in the existence of the Yeti. The question has been raised more than once by scientists, but no direct evidence of the life of such creatures on the planet has been provided by witnesses. The most common opinion is that Bigfoot is a mythical humanoid creature that lives in snowy forests and mountains. But the Yeti myth or reality - no one knows for sure.

Description of Bigfoot

A prehistoric hominid moving on two limbs, Carl Linnaeus called Homo troglodytes, which means " Caveman". Creatures belong to the order of primates. Depending on the habitat, they received different names. So bigfoot or sasquatch is a bigfoot that lives in America, in Asia Homo troglodytes is called a yeti, in India - a barung.

Outwardly, they are somewhere between huge monkey and man. The creatures look intimidating. Their weight is about 200 kg. They have a large physique with large muscle mass, long arms - up to the knees, massive jaws and a small frontal part. The creature has stocky, muscular legs with short thighs.

The whole body of Bigfoot is covered with a long (palm-sized) and dense hairline, the color of which is white, red, black, brown. The face of the Bigfoot in the lower part protrudes forward and also has hair starting from the eyebrows. The head is conical. The feet are wide, with long movable toes. The growth of the giant is 2-3 m. Yeti footprints are similar to human ones. Usually, eyewitnesses talk about the unpleasant smell that accompanies the Sasquatch.

Norwegian traveler Thor Heyerdahl proposed a classification of bigfoot:

• dwarf yeti, which are found in India, Nepal, Tibet, up to 1 m tall;
• true bigfoot has a height of up to 2 m, thick hairline, long hair on the head;
• giant yeti - 2.5-3 m tall, the traces of a savage are very similar to human ones.

Yeti food

Cryptozoologists involved in the study of species not discovered by science suggest that Bigfoot belongs to primates, and therefore has a diet similar to large monkeys. Yeti eats:

• fresh fruits, vegetables, berries, honey;
• edible herbs, nuts, roots, mushrooms;
• insects, snakes;
• small animals, birds, fish;
• frogs, other amphibians.

It is safe to assume that this creature will not disappear in any habitat and will find something to eat.

Bigfoot Habitat

Everyone can try to catch Bigfoot. To do this, you just need to know what Bigfoot looks like and where it lives. Yeti reports come mainly from mountainous areas or forests. In grottoes and caves, among rocks or in impenetrable thickets, he feels most secure. Travelers claim to have seen Sasquatch or their footprints in certain places.

1. Himalayas. This is Bigfoot's home. Here, for the first time in 1951, a huge footprint, similar to a human, was recorded on camera.
2. The slopes of the Tien Shan mountains. Climbers and rangers of this area do not cease to assert the existence of bigfoot here.
3. Altai mountains. Witnesses recorded Bigfoot approaching human settlements in search of food.
4. Karelian isthmus. The military testified that they saw a yeti with white hair in the mountains. Their information was confirmed locals and an expedition organized by the authorities.
5. Northeastern Siberia. Bigfoot traces were found in the course of ongoing research.
6. Texas. According to eyewitnesses, the Yeti lives in the local Sam Houston nature reserve. Those wishing to catch it come here regularly, but so far not a single hunt has been successful.
7. California. Ray Wallace, a resident of San Diego, made a film in 1958 in which he showed a female Sasquatch that lives in the mountains in this area. Later, information surfaced about the falsification of filming, the role of the yeti was played by Wallace's wife, dressed in a fur suit.
8. Tajikistan. In the summer of 1979, a photo of a footprint 34 cm long, discovered in the Hissar mountains, appeared.
9. India. A three-meter tall monster covered with black hair is often encountered here. The locals call him barunga. They managed to get a sample of the animal's fur. It bears a resemblance to a yeti hair obtained by the British climber E. Hillary on the slope of Mount Everest.
10. Also evidence of the existence of Bigfoot in real life found in Abkhazia, Vancouver, Yamal and in the US state of Oregon.

It is quite difficult to understand whether the existence of Bigfoot is a myth or reality. The chronicles of Tibetan monks contain records of humanoid animals covered with wool seen by temple attendants. Footprints of Bigfoot were first discovered in this region. Sasquatch stories appeared in printed editions for the first time in the 50s of the last century. They were told by climbers who conquered Everest. Immediately there were new adventurers who wanted to see the giant wild people.

Bigfoot family and offspring

The existence of tribes of snow people and children found by hunters, completely covered with wool, is evidenced by the stories of the inhabitants of Tajikistan. A family of wild people - a man, a woman and a child - was seen near Lake Paryen. The locals called them "odes of the ob", i.e. water people. The yeti family approached the water and more than once scared the Tajiks away from their homes. Numerous traces of bigfoot presence were also present here. But due to the dusty sandy soil and the insufficient clarity of the contour, it turned out to be impossible to make a plaster cast. There is no real material evidence of these stories.

The newspaper wrote about the analysis of the DNA of a real female Bigfoot The Times» in 2015. It was about the legendary wild woman Zana, who lived in the 19th century in Abkhazia. The story goes that Prince Achba caught and kept her in his cage. It was tall woman with dark gray skin. Hair covered her entire massive body and face. The cone-shaped head was distinguished by a protruding jaw, a flat nose with raised nostrils. The eyes had a reddish tinge. The legs were strong with thin shins, wide feet ended in long flexible fingers.

The legend says that over time the woman's temper subsided and she lived freely in a hole dug with her own hands. She walked around the village, expressed emotions with cries and gestures, did not learn the human language until the end of her life, but responded to her name. She did not use household items and clothes. She is credited with extraordinary strength, speed and agility. Her body retained young features until old age: her hair did not turn gray, her teeth did not fall out, her skin remained elastic and smooth.

Zana had five children from local men. She drowned her firstborn, so the rest of the descendants were taken from the woman immediately after birth. One of Zana's sons remained in the village of Tkhin. He had a daughter, who was interviewed by researchers in search of information. The descendants of Zana did not have signs of a hominid, they only had features of the Negroid race. DNA research has shown that the woman has West African roots. Her children did not have body hair, so there was speculation that the villagers may have embellished the story to attract attention.

Bigfoot by Frank Hansen

At the end of 1968 in Minnesota, in one of the wandering booths, the body of a Bigfoot frozen into a block of ice appeared. Yeti was shown to the audience for the purpose of profit. The owner of an unusual creature resembling a monkey was the famous showman Frank Hansen. A strange exhibit attracted the attention of police and scientists. Zoologists Bernard Euvelmans and Ivan Sanders urgently flew to the city of Rollingstone.

The researchers took photos and sketches of the Yeti for several days. Snowman was huge, had large legs and arms, a flattened nose, and brown fur. The big toe was adjacent to the rest, like in humans. The head and arm were pierced by a bullet wound. The owner reacted calmly to the scientists' remarks and claimed that the body had been smuggled out of Kamchatka. The story began to gain more and more popularity among journalists and the public.

The researchers began to insist on defrosting and further study of the corpse. Hansen was offered a huge sum for the right to examine Bigfoot, and then he admitted that the body was an elaborate dummy made at the monster factory in Hollywood.

Later, when the hype subsided, in his memoirs, Hansen again stated the reality of Bigfoot and told how he personally shot him while hunting deer in Wisconsin. Zoologists Bernard Euvelmans and Ivan Sanders continued to insist on the plausibility of the yeti, stating that they smelled decomposition when they examined the creature, so there can be no doubt that it is real.

Photo and video evidence of the existence of Bigfoot

To this day, no material evidence of the existence of bigfoot has been found. Samples of wool, hair, bones, provided by eyewitnesses and owners of private collections, have long been studied.

Their DNA matched DNA known to science animals: brown, polar and Himalayan bears, raccoons, cows, horses, deer and other forest dwellers. One of the samples belonged to an ordinary dog.

Skeletons, skins, bones or other remains of Bigfoot have not been found. In one of the Nepalese monasteries, a skull is kept, allegedly belonging to Bigfoot. Laboratory analysis of hair on the skull indicated morphological features Himalayan ibex DNA.

Witnesses provided numerous videos and photos of evidence of the existence of the Sasquatch, but the quality of the images leaves much to be desired each time. Eyewitnesses attribute the lack of clarity in the images to an inexplicable phenomenon.

The equipment stops working when approaching the Bigfoot. The look of Bigfoot has a hypnotic effect, introducing those present into an unconscious state when it is impossible to control their actions. Yeti also cannot be fixed clearly due to its high speed of movement and overall dimensions. Often fear and poor health prevent people from making a normal video or photo.

Yeti tales debunked

Zoologists are inclined to believe that stories about the existence of Bigfoot are unrealistic. There are no unexplored places and territories left on Earth. The last time scientists discovered a new large animal was over a century ago.

Even the discovery of an unknown species of fungus is now considered a huge event, although there are about 100 thousand of them. Opponents of the version of the existence of the yeti point to the famous biological fact: for a population to survive, more than a hundred individuals are needed, and such a number cannot be overlooked.

Numerous eyewitness accounts in the mountains and forests can be caused by the following facts:

• oxygen starvation of the brain in high altitude conditions;
• poor visibility in foggy areas, twilight, observer errors;
• intentionally lying to get attention;
• fear, which gives rise to a game of imagination;
• retellings of professional and folk legends and belief in them;
• yeti footprints found may be left by other animals, for example, Snow Leopard puts his paws in one line and his print looks like a trace of a huge bare foot.

Despite the fact that no material evidence of the reality of the Yeti, confirmed by genetic examinations, has been found, rumors about mythical creatures do not subside. There are all new evidence, photos, audio and video data that are of dubious quality and may be fake.

DNA testing is ongoing on the provided bone, saliva and hair samples, which always match DNA from other animals. Bigfoot, according to eyewitnesses, is approaching human settlements, expanding the boundaries of its range.

Bigfoot - myth or reality? Billions of people on Earth want the answer to this question.

Are you interested in the topic bigfoot photo or bigfoot video film? This article is about just that! Bigfoot or, as he is also called, bigfoot, hominoid, sasquatch is a humanoid creature that is believed to be found in the highlands and forest regions of the world. There is an opinion that this is a mammal that belongs to the order of primates and to the genus man, preserved from the time of human ancestors. Swedish naturalist, creator unified system animal classification and flora Carl Linnaeus identified him as Homo troglodytes, or, in other words, a caveman.

Descriptive Characteristics of Bigfoot

There is no exact description of Bigfoot. Some say that these are huge four-meter animals that are distinguished by mobility. Others, on the contrary, say that his height does not exceed 1.5 meters, he is passive and swings his arms strongly when walking.

All Bigfoot researchers are inclined to conclude that the yeti is a good creature, if it is not angry

According to unconfirmed data, the yeti is different from modern man pointed skull, thicker build, short neck, longer arms, short hips and a massive lower jaw. Its entire body is covered with reddish gray or black hair. The hair on the head is longer than on the body, and the beard and mustache are very short. It has an unpleasant strong odor. Among other things, he is excellent at climbing trees.

It is believed that the habitat of Bigfoot is the snowy edge, which separates forests from glaciers. At the same time, forest populations of snowmen build nests on tree branches, while mountain populations live in caves. They feed on lichens and rodents, and, before eating, the caught animals are butchered. This may indicate a close relationship with a person. In case of hunger, yeti approach people, and thus behave carelessly. According to the villagers, in case of danger, the humanoid savage makes a loud barking sound. But Chinese peasants talk about how snow people weave simple baskets, and also make axes, shovels and other elementary tools.

Descriptions suggest that the yeti is a relic hominoid that lives in married couples. However, it is possible that some people with overdeveloped unnatural hairline are mistaken for these creatures.

Early references to Bigfoot

The very first historical evidence of the existence of Bigfoot is associated with the name of Plutarch. He talked about how Sulla's soldiers caught a satyr who, according to the description, matches the appearance of a yeti.

In his short story Horror, Guy de Maupassant describes the meeting of the writer Ivan Turgenev with a female Bigfoot. There is also documentary evidence that in the 19th century there was a woman named Zana in Abkhazia, who was the prototype of the yeti. She had peculiar habits, but this did not prevent her from safely giving birth to children from people who, in turn, were distinguished by mighty strength and good health.

In the West in 1832 there were reports of a strange creature living in the Himalayas. B. G. Hodtson, an English traveler and explorer, settled in a highland region to study this mysterious creature. Later Hodtson B.G. in his works he talked about a tall humanoid creature, which the Nepalese called a demon. It was covered with long thick hair, differed from the animal in the absence of a tail and upright walking. The first mention of the Yeti Hodtson was told by local residents. According to them, for the first time about Bigfoot was mentioned in the fourth century BC.

Half a century later, the Briton Lawrence Waddell became interested in savages. At an altitude of 6,000 meters in Sikkim, he found footprints. After analyzing them and talking with local residents, Lawrence Waddell concluded that predatory yellow bears, which very often attack yaks, are mistaken for humanoid savages.

The growth of interest in bigfoot was observed in the 20-30s of the twentieth century, when one reporter called the hairy savage "a terrible bigfoot". The media also reported that several Bigfoot were caught and imprisoned, after which they were shot as Basmachi. In 1941, colonel of the medical service Soviet army Karapetyan V.S. made an inspection of a snowman caught in Dagestan. Shortly thereafter, the mysterious creature was shot dead.

Bigfoot theories and film

To date, scientists do not have sufficient data to make an official confirmation of the validity of one of the theories. However, scientists are voicing rather bold hypotheses about the emergence of the Yeti, which have the right to exist. Their opinions are based on the study of hair and footprints, photographs taken, audio recordings, identikit strange creature, as well as videos that are not of the best quality.

For a long time, a short film directed by Bob Gimlin and Roger Patterson in 1967 in Northern California was the most compelling evidence for the Yeti's existence. According to the authors, they managed to capture a female Bigfoot on film.

This happened in the fall, when Bob and Roger rode horses along a densely forested gorge in the hope of meeting a yeti, whose traces were repeatedly seen in these places. At one point, the horses were frightened of something and reared up, after which Patterson noticed a certain large creature that was squatting on the bank of the stream near the water. Glancing at the cowboys, this mysterious creature got up and walked away towards the steep slope of the gorge. Roger was not taken aback and, having taken out a video camera, ran to the stream for the creature. He ran after the savage, shooting him in the back. However, he realized that it was necessary to fix the camera and follow the moving creature, after which he knelt down. Suddenly, the creature turned and started walking towards the camera, but then, turning a little to the left, it left the stream. Roger tried to rush after him, however, thanks to his fast walking and large size, the mysterious creature quickly disappeared, and the film on the video camera ran out.

The Gimlin-Patterson film was immediately rejected by specialists from the most important scientific center in the United States - the Smithsonian Institution - as a fake. American experts said that such a hybrid with a hairy chest, gorilla head and human legs simply cannot exist in nature. At the end of 1971, the film was brought to Moscow and shown to a number of scientific institutions. Specialists of the Central Research Institute of Prosthetics and Prosthetics positively assessed him and became very interested in him. After a detailed study of the film, a written conclusion was made by the professor of the Academy physical education D.D. Donskoy, who noted that the gait of the creature on the film is absolutely not typical for a person. He regarded it as a natural movement, in which there were no signs of artificiality, and which is characteristic of various deliberate imitations.

Renowned sculptor Nikita Lavinsky also believed that the Gimlin-Patterson film was authentic. Based on the frames of this film, he even created sculptural portraits of a female Bigfoot.

The participants of the seminar on hominology Alexandra Burtseva, Dmitry Bayanov and Igor Burtsev undertook the most in-depth study of this film. Burtsev made a photographic reproduction with various expositions of stills from the film. Thanks to this work, it was proved that the head of the creature on the film was not a gorilla, as the Americans claimed, and not ordinary person, but a paleoanthrope. It is also clear that the hairline is not a special costume at all, since the muscles of the back, legs and arms are clearly visible through it. The Yeti also differs from a human in its elongated upper limbs, the absence of a visible neck, the planting of the head, and an elongated barrel-shaped torso.

The arguments on which Patterson's film is based are:

• The ankle joint of the mysterious creature, captured on film, has exceptional flexibility, which is unattainable for a person. The foot in the dorsal direction has more flexibility than a human. Dmitry Bayanov was the first to draw attention to this. Later, this fact was confirmed and described in his publications by Jeff Meldrum, an American anthropologist.

• The Yeti's heel sticks out much more than the human heel, which corresponds to the structure of the Neanderthal foot.

• The then head of the department of biochemistry at the Academy of Physical Culture, Dmitry Donskoy, who studied the film in detail, concluded that the gait of a strange creature on the film is completely not inherent in Homo Sariens, which, moreover, cannot be recreated.

• The film clearly shows the muscles on the limbs and body, which in turn eliminates the assumption of a suit. The whole anatomy distinguishes this mysterious creature from a man.

• Comparison of the frequency of hand vibrations with the speed at which the film was shot proved to be quite tall hairy creature, about 2 meters 20 centimeters, and if you take into account the complexion, then a lot of weight - more than 200 kilograms.

Based on these considerations, Patterson's film was deemed authentic. This was reported in scientific publications in the USA and the USSR. However, if the film is recognized as authentic, then the existence of living relic hominids, which are considered extinct tens of thousands of years ago, is recognized. Anthropologists cannot yet agree to this. Hence the endless number of rebuttals of the authenticity of excellent film evidence.

Among other things, ufologist Shurinov B.A. contrary to popular belief, claims that Bigfoot is of alien origin. Other researchers of the yeti mysteries insist that the origin is associated with interspecies hybridization on anthropoids, thus putting forward the theory that Bigfoot occurred as a result of crossing monkeys with humans in the Gulag.

Bigfoot photo real. Bigfoot family in Tennessee (USA)

Real photo of a frozen yeti

In December 1968, two famous cryptozoologists, Bernard Euvelmans (France) and Ivan Sanderson (USA), examined the frozen corpse of a hairy hominoid found in the Caucasus. The results of the survey were published in the scientific collection of cryptozoologists. Euvelmans identified the frozen yeti as a "modern Neanderthal".

At the same time, active searches for Bigfoot were also carried out in the former USSR. The most significant results were given by the studies of Maria-Janna Kofman in the North Caucasus, Alexandra Burtseva in Chukotka and Kamchatka. Scientific expeditions in Tajikistan and Pamir-Altai led by Igor Tatsl and Igor Burtsev ended very fruitfully. On Lovozero (Murmansk region) and in Western Siberia, Maya Bykova successfully searched. Vladimir Pushkarev devoted a lot of time to the search for the Yeti in Komi and Yakutia.

Unfortunately, the last expedition of Vladimir Pushkarev ended tragically: due to lack of funds for a full-fledged expedition, he went alone in September 1978 to the Khanty-Mansiysk district in search of bigfoot and went missing.

Janice Carter has been friends with the Yeti (Bigfoot) family for decades!

In recent years, there has been a revival of interest in the Yeti, and new regions of the distribution of modern Neanderthals have appeared. In 2002, Janice Carter, a Tennessee farm owner, said in a television interview that a whole family of Bigfoots had been living near her farm for more than fifty years. According to her, in 2002, the father of the "snowy" family was about 60 years old, and their first acquaintance took place when Janice was a seven-year-old girl. Janice Carter met Bigfoot and his family many times in her life. This drawing was made from her words and clearly shows the proportions of the yeti and its peacefulness.

Recently, Russian hominologists (Yeti researchers) found information that in 1997 in France, in the small town of Bourganef, a frozen body of a Bigfoot was demonstrated, allegedly found in Tibet and smuggled from China. There are many inconsistencies in this story. The owner of the refrigerator in which the corpse of the yeti was transported disappeared without a trace. Gone was the van itself, with its sensational contents. Photos of the body were shown by Janice Carter, who confirmed that she did not rule out that this was not a falsification, but the real Bigfoot body.

Bigfoot video. Yeti speculation and falsification

In 1958, Ray Wallace, a resident of the American town of San Diego, launched a sensational story about the Bigfoot, which is a relative of the yeti living in the mountains of California. It all started with the fact that in August 1958, an employee of Wallace's construction company came to work and saw huge footprints around the bulldozer that looked like human ones. The local press dubbed the mysterious creature the Bigfoot, and thus America got its own kind of Bigfoot.

In 2002, after the death of Ray Wallace, his family decided to reveal the secret. The footprints, 40 centimeters long, were cut from boards at Ray's request, after which he and his brother put these paws on their feet and walked around the bulldozer.

This prank captivated him so much for many years that he could not stop and periodically delighted the media and the society of lovers of the mysterious either with a recording on which he makes sounds, or with photographs with blurry monsters. But the most interesting thing was that the relatives of the deceased Wallace announced the falsification of the film, which was shot by Patterson and Gimlin. Many experts assumed that the footage was genuine. However, according to relatives and acquaintances, this filming was a staged episode in which Wallace's wife starred, dressed in a specially tailored monkey costume. This statement was a solid blow to enthusiasts who are trying to find a humanoid mysterious creature.

But back in 1969, in order to determine the authenticity of the film, John Green consulted the specialists of the Disney film studio, who created monkey costumes for the actors. They said that the creature that was filmed was wearing real skin, not a suit.

I would like to note that hundreds of volumes are devoted to the observations of the hominoid scientific literature. But there is still no concrete answer to the question of its origin and existence. On the contrary, the longer the research and search lasts, the more acutely questions are raised. Why can't catch Bigfoot? Can small populations of these creatures survive in unconnected areas? And there are many more questions that have not yet been answered...

I bring to your attention an excellent film about the Yeti with good video quality, dedicated to all aspects of this most interesting topic, which has been exciting the minds of people around the world for many years.

Snowman. Legends and Rumors

In November 2015, the American weekly news magazine Newsweek published a special 100-page edition dedicated entirely to "the greatest and most controversial legend on earth" - Bigfoot.

All the stories about the Bigfoot (or Yeti, as it is called in Asia) living in North America in particular, are somewhat similar: hairy, upright apes have long haunted the imagination of people in many parts of the world.

In the late 50s of the last century, several expeditions were made in the Himalayas in the region of Nepal in search of traces of Bigfoot. During one of them, in 1959, the Irish-American explorer and yeti hunter Peter Byrne, hiding in a cave in the Arun Valley, received a letter with a messenger from entrepreneur Tom Slick, sponsor of the expedition. It was instructed to quit hunting in Nepal and direct his way to Willow Creek (USA, Alaska), where rumors of the existence of someone like Bigfoot were recorded. Thus, both legends about the existence of Bigfoot (in Nepal and Alaska), although not obvious in their similarity, merged in the eyes of the media (Brian Sykes, The Nature of the Beast, p. 51).

There is also a Yeti in Australia; Aboriginal people talked about him and called him "big hairy guy." In the mountains of South and Central China, there have also been legends about Bigfoot, whom the Chinese call "Yeren", for two thousand years. In the 60s of the last century, even the Chinese Academy of Sciences took up the study of these legends.

Then the existence of a humanoid ape (Orang Pendek - orangutan, "forest man") was discussed on the island of Sumatra. Only here it's not a big hairy guy, but, on the contrary, someone pretty vertically challenged; even his name means " small man”, and the footprint is similar to the footprint of a seven-year-old child, only a little wider.

This creature was first noticed in 1910, and then again in 1923: then the Dutch hunter could not shoot, missing the “forest man”.

In 1989, British journalist Deborah Martin first heard about the little "forest men", and then discovered their footprints. Believing in their existence, Deborah organized an expedition to the rainforest to find Orang Pendek. (Doncaster and Holland, pp. 174-176).

Russia together with former countries Soviet Union also did not stay away from the legend of Bigfoot. Here there are fairy tales about goblin, the origins of which stretch deep into the centuries. Created and modern stories about Bigfoot, they carry the main plots of Himalayan legends. In Russia, a Bigfoot is called a wild man - Almasty, he is somewhat similar to a Mongol and lives in the North Caucasus.

It has its own stage, and the party on it is represented by people whose worldview was formed in the Soviet Union - in the 70-80s of the last century. They discuss Bigfoot along the way with complaints of ill health. They still do self-publishing, send their speakers - strange talking heads - to "sensational" TV shows, conduct tours of "yeti places" for Japanese tourists, and once a month enjoy a trip to the State Darwin Museum on a Muscovite's social card. Edward Crabtree

Evidence and traces

However, we will not rush to write off the existence of Bigfoot on the rich human imagination and call it another folk tale. Exists great amount evidence that people really met mysterious creatures similar to humans, but at the same time, causing horror, bewilderment and stun.

For example, two American biologists Edward Cronin and Jeffrey McNeely participated in a natural history expedition in the Arun Valley in Nepal in 1972. Their goal was to study the flora and fauna of the region. What they didn't expect to find were huge footprints. unknown creature, which passed through the territory of their tented camp. The tracks were discovered in the morning and resembled the tracks of primates, however, of an unknown species. The creature's foot had a short, thick and opposing thumb, asymmetrically spaced other four toes, and a wide, rounded heel. (Brian Sykes, The Nature of the Beast, p. 49).

Thirty-nine years later, in a very different territory in North Carolina, USA, a Vietnam veteran named Thomas Byers and his girlfriend Caroline Wright watched in amazement as a seven-foot-tall giant ran across the highway. The creature growled and left behind a disgusting smell. Byers was able to film a five-second video of the incident. (Bainton "Unexplained Phenomena", pp. 358-359).

Another video posted on the Internet comes from the Republic of Adygea, in southwestern Russia. The video recorded how something huge moves through the forest, as well as the traces that the creature allegedly left after the movement. Indeed, according to the NTV channel, this beast was the cause of numerous calls to local emergency services, and search and rescue teams sent to the scene found footprints 47cm long and 27cm wide.

“It could be a creature weighing at least 200 kilograms, judging by the deep footprints in the snow,” commented Andrey Kazaryan, a member of the search and rescue team (Moscow Times, January 16, 2015). However, no one has yet found a body or skeleton of such a huge creature as described above, and until this happens, biologists and zoologists will shrug and call all pseudo-evidence fiction and legend.

Bigfoot classification

Michael Trachtengertz's business card reads "independent researcher interested in human origins." In his eighties, he is sure that Almasty is a real physical being, and he expects that this will be discovered by scientists in the near future. For Michael, it's like looking for a "living fossil".

"It's no more supernatural than a gorilla or a chimpanzee", he told me with confidence during an interview in December 2015. This position is revealed in the second part of his book Fundamentals of Hominology, which he then brought to the interview. The same theory is dedicated to his website www.almas.ru.

If we consider the "living fossil" as a paradigm, then we can draw parallels with other known creatures. For example, the marine arthropods known to us as crabs have made several evolutionary changes, and it is very easy to compare them, modern, with fossilized ancestors that lived 450 million years ago.

Trakhtengertz's longtime colleague, Igor Burtsev, who heads the International Center for Hominology, in turn feels he has outgrown his idea of ​​the yeti as a living fossil. After examining wooden structures built, as Burtsev suggests, Almasty, and representing rune-like symbols, after examining the testimony of witnesses that a creature can both materialize from nowhere and disappear into nowhere, he is inclined to join the opinion of a growing number of his American colleagues , which suggest that the Yeti is a sentient creature with paranormal abilities.

This idea is reflected in publications and foreign media, and in Russia. For example, take an article in the weekly Anomalous News (December 2015), whose title translates as "Bigfoot is not a man." In addition, Burtsev suggested that Almasty may even be of extraterrestrial origin. (For more on this, see my own article "The Primates of the Paranormal" at www.unexplained.com).

Bigfoot is no more supernatural than a gorilla or a chimpanzeeMichael Trachtengertz

Although Almasty, according to Trakhtengerts, is not a peaceful creature at all, but a formidable and intimidating creature, capable of even eating human flesh, Burtsev believes that it is quite benevolent. At the same time, both researchers agree on one thing: before arguing about a description, it is necessary to prove its existence.

Igor Burtsev

Relics

In North America, Bigfootology (the science of Bigfoot as a paranormal phenomenon) is a lucrative pastime that comes bundled with TV talk shows, feature films, tough online discussions, and even litigation between parties.

In Russia, such a hype has not yet been observed, but even here they are using every opportunity to keep up with the global trend. It has its own stage, and the party on it is represented by people whose worldview was formed in the Soviet Union - in the 70-80s of the last century. They discuss Bigfoot along the way with complaints of ill health. They still do self-publishing, send their speakers - strange talking heads - to "sensational" TV shows, conduct tours of "yeti places" for Japanese tourists, and once a month enjoy a trip to the State Darwin Museum on a Muscovite's social card. These people came from Soviet period When man had his time, when travel within the Soviet Union was affordable, walking was very popular, and evolutionary speculation was allowed only within certain boundaries.

In June 2015, there were hints that the elders of Russian bigfootology found comrades-in-arms among the younger generation. 44-year-old former geography teacher Valery Sushkov, who turned out to be a ground tour operator for Roscosmos, announced the opening of a new tourist program "In the footsteps of Bigfoot" and developed the route of the Yeti Club expeditions. A special website was created, the purpose of which was to openly appeal to the players of the tourism market in order to organize expeditions for research. One of priority areas became the Kemerovo region, and the slogan was: "Mountain Shoria: Homeland of the Russian Bigfoot". Igor Burtsev, by the way, was invited to the Yeti Club as president. The organizers of this program were very optimistic, but now, six months later, Burtsev and Sushkov stopped communicating, and the site www.yetiexpedtition.ru, it seems, is still under development. Such thorny path Bigfoot seekers in Russia.

Doubts and new clues

However, such a mixture of real research with commercial needs and the attraction of tourists raised some doubts about the reality of the evidence for the existence of the Russian Almasta. Dr. Jeff Meldrum, professor of anatomy and anthropology at state university Idaho in Pocatello, USA, believes that the Yeti is not otherworldly creatures, but simply primates unknown to science. Meldrum visited the Kemerovo region, where the local government and Almasty researchers were trying to establish Bigfoot Day. Later, in an interview with the Huffington Post, he said that some of the evidence for the existence of Bigfoot was rigged. So, on the way to the cave in Gornaya Shoria, a tuft of yeti hair was allegedly found. This evidence, however, according to the professor, was pressed into the ground by a human foot. The paths leading to the cave, as he noticed, were trodden on only one side, which gave the impression that the yeti only entered the cave, but did not leave it. The alleged "nest" of Almasta, a bed of moss, did not have any traces of animal debris. Then, when he and his friend tried to go further into the cave to do their own research, they were not allowed to go by the guides. In general, the visit to Kemerovo left Meldrum with an "unpleasant feeling" (Fortean Times, March 2013).

I think my view has shifted more in favor of the fact that there is still something there, rather than vice versa.Brian Sykes

To take a turn in this Bigfoot saga, I will turn to the opinion of another doubting scientist who contributed to the study of Russian Almasta. Among the many books by Brian Sykes, professor of human genetics at the University of Oxford, is one called The Nature of the Beast. In particular, it talks about conducting DNA research on Bigfoot. The author asked researchers from all over the world to send him hair samples taken from places where anomalous primates were seen. This allowed him to conclude that the vast majority of them (samples) belong to horses and cows. These animals have long hair, hair that easily gets on the bushes and between the rocks. Sykes also points out that horses and cows are unlikely to be mistaken for male monkeys, so these negative results do not mean anything and cannot serve as a denial of Bigfoot sightings in these places.

Sykes also took a fresh look at famous case the capture of the wild woman Zana. According to legend, this woman was captured in Abkhazia (between Russia and Georgia) at the end of the 19th century. Hundreds of people watched her, and everyone agreed that her hairy body was fantastically strong. She lived on the street and could not learn human language. The woman had offspring. Burtsev was the only one who managed to unearth the skull of one of her sons in 1971. Later, Dmitry Perkulov took saliva swabs to match Zana's DNA from six living descendants in the region. After examining Zana's skull in detail, Brian Sykes testified that it was "extraordinarily large" and "out of the size range of a modern human skull" (Brian Sykes, The Nature of the Beast, p. 298).

Sykes describes the saliva test result as "very, very unusual." He found this specimen to be of African origin, but this does not match any record of Zan. The traditional explanation was that Zana was an escaped African slave. Sykes doesn't believe it. Since her description is not a description ordinary person, he concludes that she may have belonged to "an antique race of people who still live in the Caucasus!" ( Brian Sykes "The Nature of the Beast", page 306).

Of course, this explanation cannot be compared with the conclusions of Trakhtenbergets (a living fossil, prehistoric atavism), it is even less similar to Burtsev's theory of paranormal entities. True, it is significant that Sykes concludes his book with the words: “I think my view has shifted more in favor of the fact that after all “there is something there”, rather than vice versa” (Brian Sykes "The Nature of the Beast", p. 311).

Well, as we enter the Year of the Monkey, let's hope that Russian Bigfoot fans at least hold out a little longer to tell us more about the mysterious native hiding somewhere in the secluded corners of the world's largest country.

Links:

Bainton, Unexplained Phenomena (London, 2013).

Doncaster, Lucy/Holland, Andrew, The Greatest Unexplained Mysteries (London, 2006).

Sykes, Brian, "The Nature of the Beast: The First scientific evidence ape-like people who have survived in the modern world” (London, 2015).

Many myths and legends of the world closely echo real events and meetings that defy explanation. Bigfoot is one of the most controversial figures in history. Although its existence has not been proven, there are eyewitnesses who claim to have met a real yeti.

The origin of the yeti image

The first mention of the existence of a huge, hairy humanoid creature living in the mountains is found in. There is a record that a humanoid creature of incredible size inhabits this territory, possessing the instinct of survival and self-preservation.

The term Bigfoot first appeared thanks to people who went on expeditions and conquered the snow-capped peaks of the Tibetan mountains. They claimed to have seen huge footprints in the snow belonging to. Now this term is considered obsolete, as it became known that Yeti prefer mountain forests, not snow.

While there is an active discussion among scientists around the world about who Bigfoot is - a myth or reality, the inhabitants of the mountainous local eastern countries, and especially Tibet, Nepal and some regions of China, are absolutely sure of its existence and even often go out with yeti to contact. In the middle of the XX century. The government of Nepal even recognized the existence of the Yeti at the official level.

By law, anyone who can discover the habitat of Bigfoot will receive a large monetary reward.

Based on this, it can be said that the yeti is a mythical or real humanoid animal that lives in the mountain forests of Tibet, Nepal and some other areas.

Description of the appearance of the yeti

From Tibetan legends and eyewitness observations, you can learn a lot about what Bigfoot looks like. Character traits his looks:

• Yeti belongs to the family of hominids, which includes the most developed individuals of primates, i.e. humans and great apes.
• A feature of such creatures is their extremely large growth. The average adult of this species can reach from 3 to 4.5 m.
• Yeti's arms are disproportionately long and almost reach the feet.
• The whole body of a snowman is covered with wool. It can be gray or black.
• It is believed that the females of this species of hominids are distinguished by such a large breast size that during rapid movement they have to throw them on their shoulders.

The Yeti family is the American and South American Bigfoot. In some sources it is called Bolshenogiy.

The nature and lifestyle of the creature

Despite his appearance, Yeti is far from aggressive, has a relatively balanced and peaceful character. They avoid contact with people and deftly climb trees, like monkeys.

Yetis are omnivores, but prefer fruits. They live in caves, but there are suggestions that some species that live deep in the forest are able to build their own houses in trees.

Hominids are capable of reaching unprecedented speeds of up to 80 km / h, which is why they are so difficult to catch. Not a single attempt to catch the Yeti was successful.

Yeti encounters in reality

History knows many cases of meeting a person with a yeti. Typically, the protagonists of such stories are hunters and people leading a hermitic lifestyle in a forest or mountainous area.

Yeti is one of the main subjects of study for people who are fond of cryptozoology. This is a pseudoscientific direction that searches for evidence of the existence of mythical and legendary creatures. Often cryptozoologists are simple enthusiasts without higher scientific education. To this day, they put a lot of effort into capturing the mythical creature.

For the first time, footprints of Bigfoot were discovered in the Himalayan mountains in 1899. The witness was an Englishman by the name of Weddel. According to an eyewitness, he did not find the animal itself.

One of the official mentions of a meeting with a yeti dates back to 2014 during a mountain expedition of professional climbers. Forwarders conquered the highest point of the Himalayan mountains - Chomolungma. There, at the very top, they first noticed gigantic footprints that were quite long distance between themselves. Later, they saw a broad, hairy figure of a humanoid creature, reaching a height of 4 m.

Scientific refutation of the existence of the yeti

In 2017 Dr. biological sciences Pyotr Kamensky gave an interview for the scientific publication "Arguments and Facts", in which he proved the impossibility of the Yeti's existence. He used several arguments.

On the this moment There are no places left unexplored by man on Earth. The last major primate species was discovered over 100 years ago. The discoveries of modern scientists are mostly rare small plants, etc. The Yeti is too big to be able to constantly hide from researchers, zoologists and ordinary inhabitants of highlands. Yeti population size plays a big role. It is clear that in order to maintain the existence of a separate species in one locality, at least several dozen individuals must live. Hiding so many huge hominids is not an easy task.

The vast majority of evidence in favor of the existence of Bigfoot turned out to be falsification.

Yeti image in popular culture

Like many other folklore and mythical creatures, the image of Bigfoot is actively used in art and various manifestations of popular culture. Including literature, film industry and computer video games. The character is endowed with both positive and negative traits.

Bigfoot in literature

The Yeti character is actively used in their works by writers all over the world. The image of a huge hairy hominid is found both in science fiction, mystical novels, popular science works, and in children's books.

Yeti plays one of the main roles in the novel by the American science fiction writer Frederick Brown "The Horror of the Himalayas". The events of the book unfold in the Himalayan mountains during the filming of the movie. Unexpectedly, the actress who played in the film leading role, kidnaps yeti - a huge humanoid monster.

In the science fiction series "The Flat World" by the famous British prose writer Terry Pratchett, the yeti is one of the main ones. They are distant relatives of the giant trolls, living in the permafrost area behind the Sheep Mountains. They have snow-white fur, can subdue the passage of time, and their giant feet are considered a powerful aphrodisiac.

Alberto Melis' children's fantasy novel In Search of the Yeti describes the adventure of a team of explorers who set off to the Tibetan mountains in order to save Bigfoot from the ubiquitous hunters.

Character in computer games

Bigfoot can be called one of the most frequent characters computer games. Usually live in the tundra and other icy locations. For games, there is a standard image of Bigfoot - a creature resembling something in between a gorilla and a man, of gigantic growth with snow-white and thick hair. This coloration helps them to effectively camouflage themselves in the environment. Lead predatory image life and pose a danger to travelers. Brute force is used in combat. The main fear is fire.

Bigfoot and its history

Bigfoot or Sasquatch is a relative of the Tibetan Bigfoot, inhabiting the forest and mountainous areas of the American continent. The term first appeared in the late sixties thanks to the American bulldozer Roy Wallace, who discovered footprints around his house that resembled human shapes, but reached enormous sizes. Roy's story quickly gained popularity in the press, and the animal was recognized as a relative of the Tibetan Bigfoot.

After almost 9 years, Roy presented a short video footage to the media. In the video, you can see how the female bigfoot moves through the forest. This video has long been on the examination and all kinds of scientists and not only. Many recognized him as real.

After Roy's death, his friends and relatives admitted that all Wallace's stories were just fiction, and the confirmations were falsifications.

• For footprints, he used ordinary boards carved in the shape of large feet.
• The video showed the bulldozer operator's wife dressed in a suit.
• Other materials that Roy regularly showed to the public turned out to be false.

Although Roy's story turned out to be false, this does not mean that there are no anthropoid hominids in America. There are many more stories in which the Sasquatch appears as the main character. The Indians, the indigenous inhabitants of America, claim that huge hominids lived on the continent long before they themselves.

Outwardly, the bigfoot looks almost the same as its Tibetan cousin, Bigfoot. The main differences are that the maximum height of an adult reaches 3.5 m. The color of the American Bigfoot is red or brown.

Albert captured by Bigfoot

In the seventies, one Albert Ostman, who worked all his life as a lumberjack in Vancouver, Canada, told his story about how he lived in captivity with a Bigfoot family.

At that time, Albert was only 19 years old. After work, he stayed overnight on the outskirts of the forest in a sleeping bag. In the middle of the night, someone huge and strong grabbed the sack along with Albert. As it turned out later, Bigfoot stole him and took him to a cave where a female and two children also lived. The creatures did not behave aggressively towards the lumberjack, but rather treated him as humans treat pets. A week later, the guy still managed to escape.

Bigfoot History at Michelin Farm

At the beginning of the XX century. in Canada, unusual events took place on the farm of the Michelin family for some time. For 2 years they were faced with bigfoot, which simply disappeared over time. Over time, the Michelin family shared some stories from encounters with this creature.

For the first time they encountered Bigfoot face to face when they youngest daughter played near the forest. There she noticed a large, hairy creature that reminded her of a man. When Bigfoot saw the girl, he headed towards her. Then she began to scream and men with guns came running, frightening off an unknown monster.

The next time the girl saw a hominid was when she was doing household chores. It was noon. She raised her eyes to the window, then faced the gaze of that same Bigfoot, who was now intently watching her through the glass. This time the girl screamed again. Parents with a gun ran to her aid and drove the creature away with shots.

The last time Bigfoot came to the farm was at night. There he ran into dogs that were barking loudly, causing him to disappear. After that, the hominid did not appear again at the Michelin farm.

History of the frozen bigfoot

One of the most sensational stories related to the meeting of a man and a yeti is the story of an American military pilot Frank Hansen. In 1968, Frank appeared at a well-known touring exhibition. He had an unusual exhibit - a huge refrigerator, inside of which there was a block of ice. Inside this block, one could see the body of a humanoid creature, covered with wool.

A year later, Frank allowed two scientists to study the frozen creature. Over time, the FBI began to show interest in Frank's exhibit. They wanted to get the frozen corpse of Bigfoot, but he mysteriously disappeared for many years.

After Hansen's death in 2012, his family admitted that Frank kept a refrigerator with a frozen corpse in his basement for several decades. The pilot's relatives sold the exhibit to Steve Basti, the owner of the Museum of Oddities.

Professional examination of the exhibit

In 1969, Frank Hansen allowed zoologists Eivelmans and Sandersen to inspect the exhibit. They made a small scientific work describing his observations.

Hansen declined to say where he got the Bigfoot corpse from, so zoologists initially assumed it was a Neanderthal that had been preserved in a block of ice since the Stone Age. Then it was found that the creature died from a bullet wound to the head and was in the ice for no more than 2-3 years.

1. The individual was male, and reached almost 2 m in height. The peculiarity was that the entire body of the hominid was covered with thick, long black hair, which is absolutely not typical for people, even in the presence of diseases of excessive hairline.
2. The proportions of the Bigfoot body are quite close to human, but more reminiscent of the physique of a Neanderthal. Broad shoulders, too short neck, arched rib cage. The limbs also differed in their prehistoric proportions: the legs are shorter than human, arched, and the arms are too long and almost reach the heels of the hominid.
3. Bigfoot's facial features are also more reminiscent of the appearance of Neanderthals.
4. A small forehead, a large mouth without lips, a large nose with swollen eyebrows that are very close to the eyes.
5. Feet and palms are much larger and wider than human, and fingers are shorter.

Confession of Frank Hansen

There he wrote that one day he went to the mountain forests to hunt. He set off on the trail of a deer, which he had been tracking for some time, and quite unexpectedly saw a picture that shocked him. Three huge hominids, covered with black hair from head to toe, stood around a dead deer with its stomach open and finished eating its insides. One of them noticed Frank and went to the hunter. Frightened, the man shot him directly in the head. Hearing the sound of a shot, the other two Bigfoots ran away.

Many secrets keep the expanses of our vast planet. Mysterious creatures hiding from the human world have always aroused genuine interest among scientists and enthusiastic researchers. One of these mysteries was Bigfoot.

Yeti, Bigfoot, Angry, Sasquatch - these are all his names. It is believed that he belongs to the class of mammals, the order of primates, the genus man.

Of course, its existence has not been proven by scientists, however, according to eyewitnesses and many researchers, today we have Full description this creature.

What does the legendary cryptid look like?

The most popular image of Bigfoot

His physique is thick and muscular, with thick hair covering the entire surface of the body, with the exception of the palms and feet, which, according to people who met the Yeti, remain completely naked.

The color of the coat can be different depending on the habitat - white, black, gray, red.

The faces are always dark, and the hair on the head is longer than on the rest of the body. According to some reports, the beard and mustache are completely absent, or they are very short and rare.

The skull has a pointed shape and a massive lower jaw.

The growth of these creatures varies from 1.5 to 3 meters. Other witnesses claimed to have met taller individuals.

The features of the Bigfoot body are also Long hands and short hips.

The Yeti's habitat is a controversial issue, as people claim to have seen it in America, Asia, and even Russia. Presumably, they can be found in the Urals, the Caucasus and Chukotka.

These mysterious creatures live far from civilization, carefully hiding from human attention. Nests can be located in trees or in caves.

But no matter how carefully the snowmen tried to hide, there were local residents who claimed to have seen them.

First eyewitnesses

The first who happened to see the mysterious creature live were Chinese peasants. According to available information, the meeting was not a single one, but numbered about a hundred cases.

After such statements, several countries, including America and Great Britain, sent an expedition in search of traces.

Thanks to the collaboration of two eminent scientists, Richard Greenwell and Gene Poirier, evidence has been found for the existence of the Yeti.

The find was hair that was supposed to belong only to him. However, later, in 1960, Edmund Hillary got the opportunity to examine the scalp again.

His conclusion was unequivocal: the “find” was made of antelope wool.

As expected, many scientists did not agree with this version, finding more and more confirmations of the previously put forward theory.

Bigfoot scalp

In addition to the hairline found, the identity of which is still a controversial issue, there is no other documented evidence.

Except for countless photographs, footprints and eyewitness accounts.

Photos are often of very poor quality, so they do not allow you to reliably determine if these frames are real or fake.

Footprints, which, of course, are similar to human ones, but wider and longer, scientists rank among the traces of famous animals living in the find area.

And even the stories of eyewitnesses who, according to them, met Bigfoot, do not allow us to establish for certain the fact of their existence.

Bigfoot on video

However, in 1967, two men were able to film Bigfoot.

They were R. Patterson and B. Gimlin from Northern California. Being shepherds, one autumn, on the banks of the river, they noticed a creature, which, realizing that it had been found, immediately set off on the run.

Grabbing a camera, Roger Patterson set off to catch up with an unusual creature, which was mistaken for a yeti.

The film aroused genuine interest among scientists who for many years tried to prove or disprove the existence of a mythical creature.

Bob Gimlin and Roger Patterson

A number of features proved that the film was not a fake.

The size of the body and the unusual gait indicated that it was not a person.

The video noted a clear image of the body and limbs of the creature, which ruled out the creation of a special costume for filming the film.

Some structural features of the body allowed scientists to draw conclusions about the similarity of the individual from the video frames with the prehistoric ancestor of man - the Neanderthal ( approx. the last Neanderthals lived about 40 thousand years ago), but very large sizes: height reached 2.5 meters, and weight - 200 kg.

After numerous examinations, the film was found to be authentic.

In 2002, after the death of Ray Wallace, who initiated this filming, his relatives and acquaintances reported that the film was completely staged: a man in a specially tailored suit portrayed an American Yeti, and unusual footprints were left by artificial forms.

But they did not provide evidence that the film was fake. Later, experts conducted an experiment in which a trained person tried to repeat the shots taken in a suit.

They came to the conclusion that at the time the film was made, it was not possible to produce such a quality production.

There were other encounters with the unusual being, most of them in America. For example, in North Carolina, Texas and near the state of Missouri, but unfortunately there is no evidence of these meetings, except for the oral stories of people.

A woman named Zana from Abkhazia

An interesting and unusual confirmation of the existence of these individuals was a woman named Zana, who lived in Abkhazia in the 19th century.

Raisa Khvitovna, Zana's granddaughter - the daughter of Khvit and a Russian woman named Maria

The description of her appearance is similar to the available descriptions of Bigfoot: red hair that covered her dark skin, and the hair on her head was longer than on her whole body.

She did not speak articulately, but uttered only cries and isolated sounds.

The face was large, the cheekbones protruded, and the jaw protruded strongly forward, which gave it a ferocious look.

Zana was able to integrate into human society and even gave birth to several children from local men.

Later, scientists conducted research on the genetic material of Zana's descendants.

According to some sources, their origin originates in West Africa.

The results of the examination indicate the possibility of the existence of a population in Abkhazia during the life of Zana, which means that it is not excluded in other regions.

Makoto Nebuka reveals the secret

One of the enthusiasts who wanted to prove the existence of the Yeti was the Japanese climber Makoto Nebuka.

He hunted Bigfoot for 12 years, exploring the Himalayas.

After so many years of persecution, he came to a disappointing conclusion: the legendary humanoid creature turned out to be just a brown Himalayan bear.

The book with his research describes some Interesting Facts. It turns out that the word "yeti" is nothing more than a distorted word "meti", which means "bear" in the local dialect.

The Tibetan clans considered the bear to be a supernatural creature that possessed power. Perhaps these concepts were combined, and the myth of Bigfoot spread everywhere.

Research from different countries

Numerous studies have been carried out by many scientists around the world. The USSR was no exception.

Geologists, anthropologists and botanists worked in the commission for the study of Bigfoot. As a result of their work, a theory was put forward that states that Bigfoot is a degraded branch of Neanderthals.

However, then the work of the commission was terminated, and only a few enthusiasts continued to work on research.

Genetic studies of available samples deny the existence of the Yeti. A professor at Oxford University, after analyzing the hair, proved that they belonged to polar bear that existed several thousand years ago.

Still from a film shot in Northern California 10/20/1967

At present, the discussions do not subside.

The question of the existence of another mystery of nature remains open, and the society of cryptozoologists is still trying to find evidence.

All the facts available today do not give one hundred percent certainty in the reality of this creature, although some people really want to believe in it.

Obviously, only a film shot in Northern California can be considered proof of the existence of the object under study.

Some people tend to believe that Bigfoot is of alien origin.

That is why it is so difficult to detect, and all genetic and anthropological analyzes lead scientists to wrong results.

Someone is sure that science is hushing up the fact of their existence and publishes false studies, because there are so many eyewitnesses.

But questions are only multiplying every day, and answers are extremely rare. And although many believe in the existence of Bigfoot, science still denies this fact.